02-Endpoint-Threat-Detection: 03-PurpleTeam-Report

Purple Team Report: Collaborative Defense (FIN7)

• Project: 02-Endpoint-Threat-Detection

• Author: TrilloSec

• Date: 2025-02-23

1. Executive Summary

CISO Summary

Enhancing Endpoint Detection and Response Against FIN7 Techniques

• Financial Risk Reduction: Estimated reduction of potential breach costs by $58,000 per incident through improved detection and containment. (Sources: IBM 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report; KrebsOnSecurity, 2024)

• Faster Threat Detection & Containment: Improved Time-to-Detect (TTD) to under 1 minute and Time-to-Contain (TTC) to 5 minutes post-simulation.

• Strategic Security Enhancements: Implemented enhanced Sysmon rules, Sigma detections, and automated incident response playbooks for future threats.

• Compliance & Regulatory Impact: Strengthened compliance with NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, and GDPR requirements for incident response and continuous monitoring.

• Next Steps: Expand SOC automation, improve network threat detection, and initiate a cloud security simulation focusing on Azure and Microsoft 365 environments.

1.1 Purpose

This Purple Team engagement aimed to collaboratively test and enhance endpoint threat detection capabilities against FIN7-inspired attack techniques. The exercise provided insight into both the Red Team’s tactics and the Blue Team’s detection and response strategies, with a focus on reducing detection times, improving containment, and lowering financial risk.

1.2 Attack Inspiration (Real-World APT)

FIN7 is a financially motivated Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) group known for financial fraud and data theft, primarily targeting the hospitality, retail, and financial sectors. FIN7’s tactics include spear-phishing campaigns, Living-off-the-Land Binaries (LOLBins), and custom malware to gain access to financial systems and exfiltrate sensitive data.

• Scope of Impact: FIN7 has been responsible for attacks resulting in over $3 billion in losses globally since 2013. (Sources: FBI.gov; KrebsOnSecurity, 2024)

• Notable Incidents: Breaches in the hospitality and retail industries resulted in the theft of 15 million payment card records and compromises across 6,500 point-of-sale terminals. (Source: FBI.gov)

• Attack Techniques: Emphasis on weaponized LNK files, fileless malware, and C2 infrastructures leveraging HTTPS protocols.

1.3 Post-Mitigation Key Metrics

1.4 Business Impact Summary

The improvements made during this simulation resulted in:

• Reduced potential breach costs by 80%, saving approximately $58,000 per incident. (Source: IBM 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report)

• Enhanced SOC capabilities through faster detection and containment, reducing attacker dwell time.

• Strengthened compliance posture with regulations such as PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, and NIST 800-53.

• Improved endpoint visibility via enhanced Sysmon configurations and LimaCharlie EDR integration.

1.5 Next Steps

• Expand SOC automation to achieve sub-1-minute containment times.

• Develop advanced detection rules for LOLBins and fileless malware execution.

• Initiate a network threat detection simulation to address C2 communications and lateral movement.

• Plan for a cloud-focused simulation targeting Azure Active Directory and cloud infrastructure vulnerabilities.

2. Attack Lifecycle Overview (Cyber Kill Chain)

This section provides a structured breakdown of the FIN7 attack simulation using the Cyber Kill Chain framework. Each phase details Red Team actions, Blue Team detections, and post-mitigation security improvements.

2.1 Cyber Kill Chain Breakdown

Key Takeaways

This simulation highlighted detection gaps in early phases, especially delivery and exploitation. Collaborative efforts post-exercise led to:

• Quicker detection of script-based and fileless attacks.

• Enhanced visibility into persistence and C2 techniques.

• Reduced attacker dwell time through better endpoint and SIEM integration.

• Improved email security controls and user awareness to mitigate initial access attempts.

The Purple Team approach ensured that both offensive tactics and defensive measures aligned with real-world FIN7 techniques, significantly bolstering organizational defenses.

2.3 MITRE ATT&CK Mapping & Future Testing Scenarios

Key Takeaways

• Expanded detection coverage was achieved for critical phases of the attack, especially during execution and persistence stages.

• Network-based C2 detection remains an area for improvement; future tests will incorporate encrypted payload delivery and protocol variations.

• Future simulations will focus on testing alternative initial access methods and advanced evasion techniques to further strengthen defense strategies.

3. Measurable Security Improvements

This section quantifies the security enhancements made as a result of the FIN7 simulation and highlights how these improvements reduce risk, enhance detection, and accelerate response times.

3.1 Security Effectiveness Metrics

Key Takeaway

Post-simulation enhancements to Sysmon configurations, Splunk correlation rules, and LimaCharlie EDR workflows significantly improved detection and containment. While payload execution still succeeded, early-stage detections (within one minute) and rapid containment (within five minutes) mitigated the overall impact, blocking privilege escalation and persistence attempts. Future efforts should focus on automating containment to further reduce response times.

3.2 Detection & Response Enhancements

Key Takeaway

Post-test improvements significantly enhanced detection coverage, reduced attacker dwell time, and improved SOC response efficiency. Implementing automated workflows and refining SIEM correlations further strengthened overall security posture.

4. Business Impact Analysis

This section outlines the quantifiable risk reduction from implementing improved phishing detection and response mechanisms and highlights the compliance benefits of these security enhancements.

4.1 Risk Reduction Estimates

Prior to improvements, the organization was vulnerable to FIN7-style attacks that could lead to:

• Operational downtime exceeding 8 hours per incident due to endpoint compromises.

• Average potential breach costs of $72,000 per incident, including legal fees, incident response, and revenue loss. (Sources: IBM 2024 Report; KrebsOnSecurity, 2024)

• Reputational damage and potential customer churn in the event of payment data breaches.

Financial Risk Reduction

FIN7’s financial impact has exceeded $3 billion globally since 2013. (Sources: FBI.gov; KrebsOnSecurity, 2024)

Breakdown of pre-test estimated breach costs (IBM 2024 Data Breach Report):

🔹 Incident response & forensics: $25,000

🔹 Regulatory fines & legal fees: $30,000

🔹 Operational downtime & lost revenue: $50,000

🔹 Reputational damage: $15,000

Post-mitigation improvements reduced the estimated breach cost to $14,000 per incident, saving $58,000 per attack.

Key Takeaway

By leveraging Purple Team collaboration, the organization reduced financial risk by 80% and enhanced endpoint resilience against real-world threats like FIN7.

4.2 Compliance Benefits

Improving endpoint threat detection and incident response capabilities aligns with key regulatory and cybersecurity compliance standards. This simulation focused on identifying gaps in detecting FIN7-inspired attacks—such as LOLBins execution, AMSI bypasses, and persistence mechanisms—which are commonly targeted by compliance frameworks. Addressing these gaps reduces legal liability, improves incident response times, and ensures alignment with industry best practices.

Key Takeaways

• Strengthened compliance posture: The improved detection and response capabilities help meet key regulatory requirements for data protection and incident handling.

• Reduced legal exposure: Faster detection and containment of threats minimize the risk of non-compliance penalties under frameworks like GDPR and PCI-DSS.

• Improved audit readiness: Enhanced logging and detection configurations ensure that organizations are better prepared for compliance audits.

5. Findings, Recommendations, and Next Steps

5.1 Findings

This assessment identified several key detection gaps, response delays, and opportunities for improving SOC maturity against FIN7-style endpoint threats. Enhancements in detection rules, SIEM event correlation, and response playbooks significantly improved the organization’s ability to detect and mitigate threats more effectively.

Detection Gaps

• LNK Payload Detection: Initial security controls failed to detect LNK files embedded within ZIP attachments, allowing full payload delivery success.

• Process Execution Visibility: Baseline Sysmon configurations did not consistently log PowerShell executions or LOLBins usage, leading to missed detection opportunities.

• AMSI Bypass Detection: AMSI bypass attempts went undetected during initial exploitation phases.

• C2 Communication Monitoring: Outbound HTTPS and high-port TCP C2 communications were not logged or flagged by SIEM.

• Persistence Mechanism Detection: Registry modifications for persistence were initially undetected without manual investigation.

Response Delays

• Manual Containment: Threat containment took 5 minutes post-detection due to manual processes.

• Delayed Correlation: Separate alerts for execution, persistence, and C2 activities required manual correlation, slowing incident analysis.

• Inconsistent Log Coverage: Inconsistent Sysmon Event ID logging across endpoints delayed comprehensive threat identification.

SOC Maturity Improvements

• Improved Detection Coverage: Post-test configurations detected execution and persistence attempts within 1 minute of activity.

• Enhanced Process and Network Monitoring: Adjusted Sysmon and Splunk rules provided full visibility into command-line executions, registry changes, and network connections.

• Faster Threat Containment: Integration with LimaCharlie enabled host isolation within 5 minutes, reducing potential impact.

• Refined Incident Response Playbooks: Clearer containment and eradication procedures enhanced SOC efficiency and response speed.

Business Impact

• Reduced financial risk exposure by approximately $185,000 per attack, based on FIN7’s historical financial impact on victim organizations. (Source: U.S. Department of Justice press releases on FIN7 prosecutions, 2024)

• Strengthened compliance with ISO 27001 (security monitoring), PCI-DSS (threat detection), and GDPR/CCPA (data protection requirements).

• Enhanced workforce security awareness, reducing user-initiated compromises through phishing simulations and targeted training.

• Improved operational resilience, ensuring faster detection and containment of endpoint threats.

5.2 Recommendations

Implementing these recommendations will significantly improve early detection, response times, and overall resilience against FIN7-style attacks. Prioritizing endpoint visibility, network monitoring, and SOC automation ensures faster containment and reduces the organization’s financial and operational risks.

5.3 Next Steps

Immediate Priorities (1-3 months)

• Automate host isolation: Implement SIEM-to-EDR integration to enable automatic host isolation within seconds of detection.

• Refine SIEM correlation rules: Develop Splunk correlation searches that consolidate execution, persistence, and C2 events into a single high-confidence alert.

• Improve endpoint visibility: Expand Sysmon configurations to capture parent-child process relationships and command-line arguments.

• Enhance user awareness: Conduct phishing simulations and awareness training to reduce user-initiated compromises.

Mid-term Priorities (4-6 months)

• Deploy application whitelisting: Use tools like AppLocker to prevent unauthorized file executions.

• Extend log retention: Increase Splunk and Sysmon log retention to 90 days for better incident investigation and trend analysis.

• Improve network monitoring: Enable DNS and firewall logging to detect early-stage C2 traffic.

Long-term Priorities (7-12 months)

• Implement network segmentation: Limit attacker movement by isolating critical systems.

• Adopt behavioral detection tools: Evaluate machine learning-driven EDR solutions capable of detecting abnormal user and system behaviors.

• Conduct regular detection validation: Schedule biannual red team simulations and blue team drills to ensure detection rules remain effective.

Overall Goal: Enhance detection speed to under 30 seconds, reduce containment times to under 1 minute, and improve SOC response coordination.

5.4 Strategic Security Growth

Strategic security growth remains on track. Beyond immediate detection and response improvements, long-term learning objectives include testing advanced phishing techniques, improving automation, and expanding threat-hunting capabilities.

Advanced Threat Simulation & Red Teaming

• Test HTML smuggling, QR phishing, and MFA bypass techniques to evaluate phishing defense evasion strategies.

• Simulate post-exploitation scenarios in a lab environment (e.g., testing adversary emulation using tools like Cobalt Strike, BloodHound, or Empire).

• Develop custom threat intelligence feeds by manually tracking and analyzing phishing campaign indicators from OSINT sources.

Security Automation & SIEM Enhancements

• Refine SIEM correlation rules to automatically link email delivery, process execution, and network connections.

• Test SOAR-like automation using scripted response actions. Explore PowerShell or Python automation to simulate incident response playbooks.

• Improve anomaly-based threat detection by analyzing baseline system activity vs. suspicious deviations in lab-generated logs.

Expanding Blue Team & Threat Hunting Capabilities

• Increase log retention & query efficiency. Optimize Splunk queries and indexing for better long-term threat-hunting analysis.

• Analyze attack trends over multiple phishing simulations. Track how different phishing methods perform over repeated test cycles to refine detection.

• Evaluate adversary tactics using MITRE ATT&CK mapping. Expand assessments beyond phishing to cover privilege escalation, persistence, and lateral movement techniques.

6. Appendices

6.1 Sysmon Rules

Delivery: Detect Malicious Email Attachments and File Drops

    <!-- Detect Suspicious PowerShell Commands -->
    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <CommandLine condition="contains">IEX</CommandLine>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">DownloadString</CommandLine>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">DownloadFile</CommandLine>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">Invoke-WebRequest</CommandLine>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">Invoke-Expression</CommandLine>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">curl</CommandLine>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">wget</CommandLine>
    </ProcessCreate>

    <!-- Detect Dropped Executables or DLLs in Public/Temp Folders -->
    <FileCreate onmatch="include">
      <TargetFilename condition="contains">\\Users\\Public\\</TargetFilename>
      <TargetFilename condition="end with">.exe</TargetFilename>
      <TargetFilename condition="end with">.dll</TargetFilename>
    </FileCreate>

Exploitation: Detect AMSI Bypass Attempts

  <!-- Event ID 1: Process Creation -->

    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <Image condition="end with">powershell.exe</Image>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">amsi</CommandLine>
    </ProcessCreate>

    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <Image condition="end with">powershell.exe</Image>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">bypass</CommandLine>
    </ProcessCreate>

    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <Image condition="end with">powershell.exe</Image>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">Reflection.Assembly</CommandLine>
    </ProcessCreate>

    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <Image condition="end with">powershell.exe</Image>
      <CommandLine condition="contains">Add-Type</CommandLine>
    </ProcessCreate>

    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <Image condition="end with">powershell.exe</Image>
      <CommandLine condition="regex">.*(New-Object\s+System\.Net\.WebClient|IEX|DownloadString).*</CommandLine>
    </ProcessCreate>


  <!-- Event ID 10: Process Access (Catches memory manipulation attempts like WriteProcessMemory) -->

    <ProcessAccess onmatch="include">
      <SourceImage condition="end with">powershell.exe</SourceImage>
      <TargetImage condition="contains">amsi.dll</TargetImage>
      <GrantedAccess condition="contains">0x1F0FFF</GrantedAccess> <!-- Full access permission often used in process injection -->
    </ProcessAccess>


  <!-- Event ID 8: CreateRemoteThread (Common in memory-based AMSI bypass techniques) -->

    <CreateRemoteThread onmatch="include">
      <SourceImage condition="end with">powershell.exe</SourceImage>
      <TargetImage condition="contains">amsi.dll</TargetImage>
    </CreateRemoteThread>

Installation: Detect Persistence via Registry and Scheduled Tasks

    <!-- Detect Registry Key Modifications (Run & RunOnce Keys) -->
    <RegistryEvent onmatch="include">
      <TargetObject condition="contains">\\Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Run</TargetObject>
    </RegistryEvent>
    <RegistryEvent onmatch="include">
      <TargetObject condition="contains">\\Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\RunOnce</TargetObject>
    </RegistryEvent>

    <!-- Detect Scheduled Task Creation -->
    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <CommandLine condition="contains">schtasks</CommandLine>
    </ProcessCreate>

C2: Detect Suspicious Network-Based C2 Activity

    <!-- Detect Connections to Known C2 Ports -->
    <NetworkConnect onmatch="include">
      <DestinationPort condition="is">4444</DestinationPort>
      <DestinationPort condition="is">1337</DestinationPort>
      <DestinationPort condition="is">8080</DestinationPort>
      <DestinationPort condition="is">9001</DestinationPort>
    </NetworkConnect>

    <!-- Detect Connections to High Ports Above 1024 (Excluding 80, 443, 8443) -->
    <NetworkConnect onmatch="include">
      <DestinationPort condition="greater_than">1024</DestinationPort>
      <DestinationPort condition="is not">80</DestinationPort>
      <DestinationPort condition="is not">443</DestinationPort>
      <DestinationPort condition="is not">8443</DestinationPort>
    </NetworkConnect>

Actions on Objectives: Detect Forced System Impact Demonstration

    <!-- Detect Forced Execution of Microsoft Edge (msedge.exe) -->
    <ProcessCreate onmatch="include">
      <Image condition="end with">msedge.exe</Image>
    </ProcessCreate>

6.2 Sigma Rules

Optimized Sigma queries were created to detect suspicious activity tied to FIN7 style attacks.

1️⃣ Delivery: Detect Malicious Email Attachments and File Drops

Save as: delivery_malicious_attachments.yml

title: Detect Malicious File Downloads and File Drops
id: d1a9e9c8-5f88-487d-b5ea-4c4f173a0340
status: experimental
description: Detects use of PowerShell or similar tools to download files and suspicious file drops into public directories.
author: TrilloSec
date: 2025-02-23
logsource:
  product: windows
  service: sysmon
detection:
  selection_download:
    EventID: 1
    CommandLine|contains:
      - "IEX"
      - "DownloadString"
      - "DownloadFile"
      - "Invoke-WebRequest"
      - "Invoke-Expression"
      - "curl"
      - "wget"
  selection_filedrop:
    EventID: 11
    TargetFilename|contains:
      - "\\Users\\Public\\"
    TargetFilename|endswith:
      - ".exe"
      - ".dll"
  condition: selection_download OR selection_filedrop
fields:
  - CommandLine
  - TargetFilename
level: high
tags:
  - attack.initial_access
  - attack.t1566.001
  - attack.execution
  - attack.t1204

2️⃣ Exploitation: Detect AMSI Bypass Attempts

Save as: exploitation_amsi_bypass.yml

title: Detect AMSI Bypass Attempts via PowerShell
id: 5e5c6d4d-f0f2-42cc-809a-b7f68ac57419
status: experimental
description: Detects attempts to bypass AMSI using PowerShell commands and known bypass methods.
author: TrilloSec
date: 2025-02-23
logsource:
  product: windows
  service: sysmon
detection:
  selection:
    EventID: 1
    Image|endswith: "\\powershell.exe"
    CommandLine|contains:
      - "amsi"
      - "bypass"
      - "Reflection.Assembly"
      - "Add-Type"
      - "DownloadString"
      - "IEX"
  condition: selection
fields:
  - CommandLine
  - Image
level: critical
tags:
  - attack.defense_evasion
  - attack.t1562.001

3️⃣ Installation: Detect Persistence via Registry and Scheduled Tasks

Save as: installation_persistence.yml

title: Detect Persistence via Registry and Scheduled Tasks
id: c2a06fdf-430e-4e2d-b9a6-e9afc64ab232
status: experimental
description: Detects persistence mechanisms through registry run keys and use of schtasks.
author: TrilloSec
date: 2025-02-23
logsource:
  product: windows
  service: sysmon
detection:
  selection_registry:
    EventID: 13
    TargetObject|contains:
      - "\\Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Run"
      - "\\Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\RunOnce"
  selection_schtasks:
    EventID: 1
    CommandLine|contains: "schtasks"
  condition: selection_registry OR selection_schtasks
fields:
  - TargetObject
  - CommandLine
level: high
tags:
  - attack.persistence
  - attack.t1547

4️⃣ C2: Detect Suspicious Network-Based C2 Activity

Save as: c2_suspicious_network_activity.yml

title: Detect Suspicious Network-Based C2 Activity
id: f07c6da0-e7d7-4e89-94ae-d8bb8dc4d9c2
status: experimental
description: Detects network connections to ports commonly used for C2 or high random ports beyond typical ranges.
author: TrilloSec
date: 2025-02-23
logsource:
  product: windows
  service: sysmon
detection:
  selection_common_ports:
    EventID: 3
    DestinationPort|in: [4444, 1337, 8080, 9001]
  selection_uncommon_high_ports:
    EventID: 3
    DestinationPort|gt: 1024
    DestinationPort|not_in: [80, 443, 8443]
  condition: selection_common_ports OR selection_uncommon_high_ports
fields:
  - DestinationPort
  - DestinationIp
  - SourceIp
level: high
tags:
  - attack.command_and_control
  - attack.t1071.001

5️⃣ Actions on Objectives: Detect Forced System Impact Demonstration

Save as: actions_on_objectives_browser_execution.yml

title: Detect Forced Browser Execution (RickRoll Simulation)
id: 3dc2d44d-b1a1-4696-bb56-e4c37ac86efc
status: experimental
description: Detects unauthorized forced execution of a browser, indicative of impact or user manipulation.
author: TrilloSec
date: 2025-02-23
logsource:
  product: windows
  service: sysmon
detection:
  selection:
    EventID: 1
    Image|endswith: "\\msedge.exe"
  condition: selection
fields:
  - Image
  - CommandLine
level: medium
tags:
  - attack.impact
  - attack.t1491.001

TL;DR

Purple Team collaboration cut detection time to <1 minute, containment to 5 minutes, and reduced financial risk by $58K per incident through improved endpoint threat detection, C2 disruption, and enhanced SIEM alerting.

Download PDF:

Other Reports in This Project

✔ Red Team: Simulated a FIN7-inspired endpoint attack using LNK payloads, PowerShell execution, and C2 channels to test detection gaps.

✔ Blue Team: Developed Sysmon, Splunk, and LimaCharlie EDR detection rules, reducing detection time to under 1 minute and containment to 5 minutes.

✔ Purple Team: Quantified risk reduction of $58K per incident, aligned defenses with NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and improved SOC response efficiency.

✔ Setup Guide: Configured attack and defense environments with Gophish, Metasploit, Sysmon, and Splunk for consistent, repeatable testing.